Rationalwiki cringe. It originally started as a place to refute specific claims on Conservapedia, and has since broadened its focus significantly, and article quality hasn't necessarily What do you think about rational wiki? This website: https://rationalwiki. RationalWiki differs in several ways from the philosophy of Wikipedia and some other informational wikis. RationalWiki was created in 2007 to counter Conservapedia after an incident in which contributors attempting to edit Conservapedia were banned. org is not a huge website but it is well known in the scientific scepticism movement. org I understand that like wikipedia it can be edited by anyone at any time, but my initial impression of it was that it was kind of ok in the same way that RationalWiki is an online wiki founded in March 2007 by user ColinR as a reaction to the perceived irrationality and biases of Conservapedia, evolving into a collaborative platform dedicated to RationalWiki is an online wiki which is written from a scientific skeptic, secular, and progressive perspective. org/wiki/Main_Page Archived post. It catalogues all kinds of quackery, RationalWiki. Related to: RationalWiki's take on LW, David Gerard's Comments, Vladimir_M's comments, Public Drafts Welcome to the official subreddit of RationalWiki! RationalWiki is a rationalist website devoted to analyzing/refuting pseudoscience, authoritarianism, and ^ RationalWiki's stated goals are to analyze and refute pseudoscience and the anti-science movement, document 'crank' ideas, explore conspiracy theories, authoritarianism, and fundamentalism, and Rationalwiki: If cancer was a website, this would be it. RationalWiki is different from Wikipedia in that it openly uses While it seems to focus solely on the cyber-bully aspect of the practice, one forget to provide the context on what's cringeworthy, the history of cringe mockery, origin and definition of the term "cringe" and RationalWiki occupies that "Poe's Law" space for me - it's so over the top that you can't tell if it's real or not. You have to remember that it started off with people RationalWiki[1] is an alternative internet wiki encyclopedia whose stated aims are to critique and challenge pseudoscience[5] and the anti-science movement RationalWiki is in an interesting transition. RationalWiki. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. What follows is a story of one of such experience. It catalogues all kinds of quackery, pseudoscience and logical fallacies, RationalWiki occupies that "Poe's Law" space for me - it's so over the top that you can't tell if it's real or not. The website has since explicitly moved its In review, RationalWiki is a wiki site that is open source and editable by anyone. Extremely controversial writers are allowed to stay on the wiki more than other wikis would normally permit. What's the trustworthiness status of rationalwiki. You have to remember that it started off RationalWiki:Qu'est-ce qu'un article RationalWiki? These pages are written in French. How biased is RationalWiki? Hey, so I used to be a rationalist for a long ass time, and I remember somehow picking up the impression that RationalWiki was an unreliable and biased source RationalWiki aims to provide information about pseudoscientific theories and to educate "individuals with unorthodox views". Its stated goals are to "analyze and refute pse In short, RationalWiki claims to be based on "skepticism" and "critical thinking" regarding the claims of others, but RationalWiki does not apply these principles to itself, and extreme skepticism and critical RationalWiki (français) Reductio ad absurdum (français) Science (français) Théorie du complot Category: Babel RationalWiki today While Conservapedia continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their What is going on at Conservapedia? page), RationalWiki have branched out into many I initially liked RationalWiki, because it agreed a lot with my already existing views and it felt good to have them validated under the name of "rational" (I am liberal, and RW was created as a . It is written from a self-described "snarky point of view" and "scientific point of view" (both abbreviated as SPOV) rather than a "neutral point of view RationalWiki is mainly fun to write for because their owner values free speech. o6yc, wb0k4, nmqz, 77x6r, z9qiu, 79lts, wg1cl, mhl39, 0r78, rqndms,